The book of Exodus states that the Hebrews traveled through the Wilderness of Shur on their way to Mount Sinai. Our research into Shur’s location provides indicates it should be on the Arabian Peninsula, further substantiating the theory that Mount Sinai is in modern-day Saudi Arabia.
The traditional location for Shur is as seen below:
Several passages in the book of Genesis appear to place Shur in this traditional spot, but evidence that we have found puts Shur further east, into the Arabian Peninsula.
Ishmael Settled from Havilah to Shur, East of Egypt
One of the big clues that the Bible gives about the location of Shur is in Genesis 25:18 when the author says that Ishmael settled in the land “east of his brothers” (CEV), or “opposite Egypt” (ESV):
They settled from Havilah to Shur, which is opposite Egypt in the direction of Assyria. He settled over against all his kinsmen.
Shur, according to the text, is east of the land of Egypt, as one heads towards Assyria. The likeliest location based on that description would be the Arabian Peninsula, as it is directly between ancient Egypt and Assyria.
Easton’s Bible Dictionary (1893) supports this analysis, stating that Shur is “a part, probably of the Arabian desert, on the north-eastern border of Egypt, giving its name to a wilderness extending from Egypt towards Phillistia…The name was probably given to it from the wall which the Egyptians built to defend the frontier on the north-east from the desert tribes.”
Havilah in Northern Arabia
This idea is supported by the 1992 Anchor Bible Dictionary, where W.W. Müller holds that Havilah must be in northern Arabia.
Joseph’s Slavery: Ishmael, Midian, and Shur
The story of Joseph being sold into slavery by his brothers provides further evidence that the Wilderness of Shur is in the Arabian Peninsula and, therefore, Mount Sinai should also be located there.
As previously mentioned, Ishmael settled in Shur. Therefore, identifying his descendants (the Ishmaelites) would help to identify Shur.
Genesis 37:25-28 refers to the people of Midian (in northwestern Arabia) as being Ishmaelites:
Then they sat down to eat a meal. And as they raised their eyes and looked, behold, a caravan of Ishmaelites was coming from Gilead, with their camels bearing aromatic gum and balm and myrrh, on their way to bring them down to Egypt. Judah said to his brothers, “What profit is it for us to kill our brother and cover up his blood?
Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites and not lay our hands on him, for he is our brother, our own flesh.” And his brothers listened to him.
Then some Midianite traders passed by, so they pulled him up and lifted Joseph out of the pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver. Thus they brought Joseph into Egypt.
Verse 36 again states,
“Meanwhile, the Midianites sold him in Egypt to Potiphar, Pharaoh’s officer, the captain of the bodyguard.”
Genesis 39:1 then again indicates that the Midianites are a part of the Ishmaelite line of descendants:
“Now Joseph had been taken down to Egypt; and Potiphar, an Egyptian officer of Pharaoh, the captain of the bodyguard, bought him from the Ishmaelites, who had taken him down there.”
Czech explorer Alois Musil also made note of this in his 1926 book The Northern Hegaz: A Topographical Index. In the book, he stated:
Genesis 37:25, relates that Ishmaelite merchants came from Gilead on camels, bringing various fragrant spices to Egypt, and arrived at the well into which the sons of Jacob had cast their brother Joseph. According to Genesis 37:28, the Madianite merchants drew him out, bought him, and took him to Egypt. The names Madinate and Ishmaelite would here seem to be used interchangeably.Alois Musil, The Northern Hegaz: A Topographical Index, American Geographical Society (1926), 298.
Amalekites in Shur
1 Samuel 15:7 says, “Then Saul slaughtered the Amalekites from Havilah all the way to Shur, east of Egypt.”
Dr. Lennart Möller writes in The Exodus Case that the Amalekites were an Arabian people, the oldest tribe of Arabia and the founders of the city of Medina.
The Encyclopedia Brittanica states that “The district over which they [the Amalekites] ranged was south of Judah and probably extended into northern Arabia.” The Jewish Encyclopedia likewise states that the Amalekites lived in northern Arabia.
Alois Musil also stated in The Northern Hegaz ‘s section on the Amalekites that this people group likely resided to the west or northwest of Petra, in the southern parts of Palestine, and extending into the territory towards the south as well.
Further Pinpointing the Wilderness of Shur’s Location
There is a strong case to be made that the Wilderness of Shur is in Arabia. A more precise estimate of its location can be determined by reviewing where it should be located on the Exodus route.
The Wilderness of Shur should be located to the east of the Yam Suph crossing site, commonly referred to as the Red Sea Crossing.
Exodus 15 indicates that the Bitter Springs of Marah, the first stop after the Red Sea Crossing, is located within or adjacent to the Wilderness of Shur.
Elim, where the Hebrews find 12 wells and 70 palms, should be located on a traversable path from Marah through the Wilderness of Shur. Since Elim and Marah must be in modern-day Saudi Arabia, it logically follows that Shur must also be there.
The traditional location for the Wilderness of Shur is directly east of Goshen in the northern part of the Sinai Peninsula, along the way of the Philistines. However, a closer look at the Biblical texts reveals a different location. These links of evidence point to Shur being in the Arabian Peninsula, and not in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.
 Müller, W. W. (1992). “Havilah (Place).” In the Anchor Bible Dictionary. Volume 3, p. 82.
 Lennart Möller, The Exodus Case, 4th ed. (Copenhagen, Denmark: Scandinavia Pub. House, 2010),278.
 W. Max Muller, Kaufmann Kohler. Amalek, Amalekites. Jewish Encyclopedia. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/1351-amalek-amalekites
Last updated May 22, 2019